Day 5 of blogging work, 6/11

Today, I read the proposal one more time through and cleaned up mostly stylistic awkwardness and typos. Yesterday went well.  I worked through transitions that were bothering me in the Project Abstract, and I also straightened out the Audience and Relationship to Other Criticism sections. I feel weird saying this, but I feel really good about the proposal. I suspect that it is still too long. Today I sent it to a friend who is an Assistant Professor, almost tenured, who finished her first book several years ago, and also to a committee member/mentor from grad school. I am hoping to have my husband read it once he returns from his trip.  I figure that after all of those readings, I will have a better sense of where to cut.

So, I think I am on track to send out the proposal to the first press some time next week. It feels exciting. I have been surprised to find out how much more I enjoyed the proposal description of the project, more than any other iteration of the whole project that I’ve had to do before–like the abstract for my dissertation, job materials, etc. It was a bit longer than the project abstract I wrote for my job materials, so I feel like I was better able to explain and flesh out the project’s theoretical dimensions. I also felt like I was able to keep hitting the same points and conclusions. This might make the proposal sound slightly repetitive, so I’m interested to hear what my draft readers think. But I was still happy that, over many years, the project description has gone from being a somewhat hazy web of interrelated, but multiple, “key” arguments to being much more focused and precise, able to be boiled down effectively into one sentence that I felt good about. My husband was the first to point this out, but in the book proposal, you see the same concepts, ideas, and arguments re-emerging, rather than a big mess of ideas. I don’t know if I’m explaining this effectively, but it seems like one of the first signs of real progress, which is exciting because throughout this process–from writing the diss to turning it into a book–is so amorphous and lacks concrete milestones.

After sending out the proposal this morning, I got to work on the sample chapter that I will be sending to the press along with the proposal. Fortunately, part of this particular chapter has been accepted for publication, so I feel pretty good about almost half of the chapter. Naturally–as always–the introduction and conclusion need work, as does my treatment of the other narrative (the one that isn’t included in the journal article). I had been working on this chapter this past spring, when my mentor/committee member suggested that I get started on the book proposal and stop spinning my wheels on endless revisions before Press readers even saw the manuscript.  After working on the book proposal so much for the past six weeks, it feels good to get my hands into a chapter again, and not have to write in the big picture all of the time. We’ll see how long that holds up.

For anyone who reads this who is interested in process, for much of the spring, I followed the advice in the book How to Write a Lot.  I scheduled time for writing and didn’t let anything interfere with that time.  I am finding it much harder to do this in the summer.  However, I am using a timer software program, which I turn on the minute I start working and turn off if I ever stop working to do anything.  This has helped me make sure that I am still getting in good amounts of writing time.  I’d like to get back onto the How to Write a Lot mindset because I think it is really helpful and accurate.  It really prevents academics from making the silly excuses we so often make (the worst of which is “I need chunks of time to write”).  One thing he also recommends is setting daily writing goals, which you track in a database.  (I also track them on this blog, as you can see below.)  In addition to all that, he advises making a list of writing projects, which you should revise at least about once a month.  Today, I went through that process and set up new long-term writing goals, based on what I think I need to get done should the Press get back to me and demand the entire manuscript.  I think I’ll post those tomorrow.

Goal today: send out proposal to friend reviewers; work for 1.5 hours on chapter

Goal met: Yes.

Word count of proposal: 3,607 (still a bit longer than I would like)

Word count of chapter: 18, 973

Leave a Comment

Day 4 of blogging work, Tuesday 6/10

Today was a better day.  Made really solid headway on the proposal, finishing it except for one more run through.

Goal: finish draft of proposal; work 3 hours.

Goal met?  Yes.

Leave a Comment

Day 3 of blogging work–actually Monday, June 9

Had a bad day on Monday. Couldn’t get motivated or focused.

Goal: 3 hours of work on proposal.

Goal met? No. Actual work about 2 hours.

Leave a Comment

Sunday, Day 2 of blogging

Today was a bit of an off day. Unlike my usual routine, I did not try to write early in the morning. I got distracted with Sunday morning life things and then wasted bunches of time on the internet, which gave me pretty vicious eye strain. Before I sat down for dinner, though, I did put in my hour of writing.

First: I keyed in a bunch of changes that I had already written on the hard copy of the proposal and did manage to cut some words.

Second: I stumbled across some old text about the project’s relationship to current criticism, which I had completely forgotten I had written. I like the language, so that is a good find. I am finding that section hard to write. First, I somewhat address it (though I don’t think well) in both the Overview and Abstract sections. Second, I’m not sure how to write about it without seeming to faun over or disparage other works. I want to just write a list of related works and say: my book is like these other ones. But different! I don’t think that’s what presses are interested in, but I think that’s in fact what I’ve basically written in sentence form. Then, I have a much longer paragraph about how my project uses historically grounded terms, rather than ones taken from contemporary discourse and displaced onto an earlier time period. But I worry that this is over-inflating the quality of my project. Harumph.

Goal for today: one hour; keep reducing words.

Goal accomplished? Yes (but just barely)

Current word count: 3,613 (this is making me happy)

Goal for tomorrow: Put in 3 hours of writing. Clean up transitions in proposal and beef up some of the weaker sections, esp Rationale, Audience, and Relation to Criticism. Tighten Abstract. For a different project, I need to put together a short application for a pedagogy conference.

Leave a Comment

Day 1 of blogging, day ? of book working

I am starting this blog in the hopes that it will keep me motivated to work on my book proposal and book project during the summer. I am currently an Assistant Professor of English at a Liberal Arts college, the summer after my second year on the tenure-track. I have been working on turning my dissertation into a book when I have had time to do so over the past two years and have so far had two portions of the book published in pretty good peer-reviewed journals. Right now, I’m not going to tell anyone about this blog, but just use it as personal motivation. I hope, if I keep up with it, that it might provide help for those who are pursuing this same endeavor or are about to pursue this same endeavor. Like so many things in academia, there seems an expectation that one just knows how to get a publisher to accept and publish one’s book, and though I have researched and asked some questions, I am still quite bewildered. Maybe by documenting this process, I–and perhaps any readers who show up–will become less so. I think that’s enough for introductions.

Today, I worked through my book proposal again. Right now, the proposal is 4,079 words long, which is way too long. (Exactly how long I need to cut it is somewhat of a mystery to me. But I know that 4000+ words is longer than I want it to be. I am going to shoot to at least get it to more like 3500.) It consists of the following sections: Overview, Audience, Rationale for the Press (why this press should be interested in this book), Abstract, Relationship to Other Work, and Scope (a table of contents and timeline, really).

I really like the Overview now. It got cobbled together from about 12 different sources, including job letters, project abstracts from job materials, old parts of the diss, and on and on. I think the Audience part is still a little weak. I spent some time today looking up courses in my project’s sub-field. I’ve read on some web sites that this is helpful to do in academic book proposals, though the enterprise seems somewhat bogus to me. There’s of course no guarantee that any of the professors of these courses would even consider using my book. But since it’s a (sort of) interdisciplinary project, I wanted to show that people outside of my narrow field might have interest in this monograph, and counting up courses in this interdisciplinary sub-field was one way to show it. I haven’t yet put in any language that uses this number into the proposal, though I think the final sentence will probably end up looking like, “[Programs in this sub-field] are increasingly incorporating the humanities into their curricula, with over 25 of the top [program name] now offering courses specifically devoted to [sub-field].” It’s very hard to balance the marketing tone and the academic tone, I’m finding. It’s somewhat like job materials, but not quite.

I’m still working on the Abstract. It is, of course, entirely too long, comprising 2400 of the total 4,079 words of the whole proposal. I am working on trimming it, slowly but surely.

Time spent on project today: approximately 1.5 hours.

Goals for today: Make more comprehensible and fluid the Rationale and Audience sections. Continue to tighten Abstract.

Goals met?  Yes.

Word count at end of day: 3,926 (with more changes to be input tomorrow)

Goals for tomorrow: Read through of whole document. Complete one hour of work on proposal. (It’s Sunday after all. Plus I’m trying not to burn out on this thing.)

Leave a Comment